A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out among prospective neighbours about the development of a wall at a coastal web-site in a north Dublin suburb, a situation which has captivated national focus next an Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on the proposed spouse and children house at Sutton Strand, wherever allegations of organizing breaches, environmental concerns, and very long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in to the courts. The Irish Periods post about René Collier as well as Irish Instances short article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a local disagreement has advanced right into a highly publicised legal fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around construction performs at the internet site on Dublin Road, Sutton, the place Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a corporation director respectively, look for to create their spouse and children house. The case is becoming emblematic of wider disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, the place progress pressures collide with environmental protections and the sensitivities of established residents. According to the Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall getting produced by their possible neighbours goes outside of the boundaries permitted underneath setting up authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both equally inhabitants of Dublin Street, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms in their setting up permission by building a wall beyond the boundaries in their web page, resulting in an encroachment on the Unique Region of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, therefore parts are matter to stringent controls under European and Irish environmental regulation. Inside their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even insignificant encroachments could have lasting ecological consequences, specially in the sensitive coastal ecosystem for instance Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They may be in breach in their arranging authorization, and say the wall, that's partially designed, is in the correct situation. Their legal staff has characterised the action as an make an effort to delay or frustrate a lawful progress. The couple accuse litigants of trying to find to halt homebuilding as a way to maintain their check out, an allegation which has been recurring in court and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of many coastal arranging disputes, where views of the sea are both equally highly prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained extraordinary attempts because of the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the internet site, In accordance with sworn proof referenced from the Irish Times. In one account, Rene Collier waded as a result of midsection-substantial drinking water in the course of a storm to photograph the website Irish Times, a picture which has because become emblematic of your intensity of the dispute. These steps were not just symbolic; they had been meant to Get visual proof of the wall’s situation relative to tidal lines and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning with the sea Irish Instances reported, describing how the two Adult males entered the drinking water during significant weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading via storm drinking water to photograph the internet site grew to become one of the most placing descriptions to arise from court reporting. The Irish Instances posting about accountant Paul Feely mentioned that these steps had been cited to show the plaintiffs’ belief that the wall extended into a location afflicted by tidal motion, strengthening their argument that the SAC was getting encroached on.
The situations at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were lined intimately because of the countrywide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Instances January 27 2026 grew to become broadly searched phrases as viewers sought to be familiar with the background and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court read further more submissions on regardless of whether interim orders really should be granted to halt development pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a crucial second inside the legal timeline.
In the core of the dispute is a disagreement around boundaries, scheduling compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely manage which the wall, as produced, goes over and above what was accredited and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has long been referred to as meticulous in his examination of planning files, maps, and problems attached into the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have each pressured that their action is enthusiastic by problem for environmental security and adherence to setting up law. They reject promises that the case is about preserving A non-public see, insisting instead that it is about making sure that growth at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological boundaries. In affidavits, they have described their extensive-standing link to the region and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a pair just endeavoring to develop a spouse and children residence in accordance While using the law. They deny that the wall encroaches over a Distinctive Location of Conservation and say that each one is effective happen to be completed based upon professional suggestions and permitted options. Their legal professionals have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the dramatic steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, such as getting into the sea in the course of a storm, tend not to alter the underlying specifics.
The case has also raised broader questions about how preparing disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute more than building Paul Feely and Rene Collier of wall at coastal web site is now a shorthand description for any circumstance that lots of observers see as progressively frequent. As sea amounts rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation involving non-public land, community foreshore, and guarded habitats is becoming more contentious.
The Irish Situations short article about René Collier observed that the businessman experienced Earlier been involved in local advocacy on scheduling and environmental difficulties, even though not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Periods write-up about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how individuals from incredibly diverse Expert backgrounds can discover themselves aligned in these types of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some studies spell their names, have become synonymous Along with the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location in the sea Irish Periods coverage emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded as a result of waist-substantial h2o in the course of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Instances and René Collier waded by midsection-large drinking water all through a storm to photograph the website Irish Moments are phrases that appeared consistently in protection, reflecting each the Bodily actuality with the coastline and the symbolic nature from the act. For supporters on the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated motivation; for critics, they illustrated the things they see being an abnormal tactic.
Given that the High Court proceedings go on, the result continues to be unsure. The court docket ought to identify whether or not the wall as designed complies with scheduling authorization and whether any encroachment right into a Exclusive Place of Conservation has transpired. The authorized arguments are sophisticated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal info, and preparing circumstances. However the human element continues to be central: neighbours who ought to Dwell alongside one another very long after the lawful expenditures are already paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over development operates at the website on Dublin Highway, Sutton, even so the implications of the case prolong past that handle. For planners, developers, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves like a reminder of the necessity of clarity in arranging permissions and sensitivity in coastal improvement. In addition it underscores how speedily an area disagreement can escalate when basic challenges including environmental security and home legal rights are perceived to be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays a location of organic natural beauty and contested boundaries. The wall on the centre with the dispute stands partly constructed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved lawful questions. No matter whether it will eventually in the end be altered, taken out, or done as prepared will depend on the court’s findings. Right up until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will possible continue to appear in headlines, linked indelibly to Just about the most carefully watched organizing disputes in north Dublin in recent times.